Insatisfait(e) des avis ci-contre ?
Filtres
Nos membres ont également aimé :
Cet avis n'est plus disponible
Causes possibles :
- L'avis a été supprimé par son auteur
- L'avis a été supprimé par un modérateur du site car il ne correspondait pas à la charte de qualité du site
- Le lien sur lequel vous avez cliqué peut être sectionné. Nous vous conseillons de le vérifier.
4.0/5(6 avis)
50 %
33 %
17 %
Donner un avis
Avis des utilisateurs
- JimboSpins
Génial si vous pouvez l'obtenir à un bon prix
Publié le 10/12/12 à 05:21 (contenu en anglais)The Casio CZ-1 is a 61 key digital synth that can be purchased used for a very affordable price. That is what made me purchase is, I found one online for less than 200 dollars and purchased it immediately. They keys do not feel great though, I have had better keys on a cheap MIDI controller and the touch sensitivity is almost absent. But you will get a lot of options with this keyboard. This is a 16 voice polyphony keyboard that you cannot sequence on but you can just use it as a sound module and record your sounds out to your DAW.
UTILIZATION
There are a total of 64 presets on the CZ-1, most of them are not very great alone. I usually take the presets and run them through an external rig or sound effects module to get them to sound the way that I want them to sound because the only effects that you can use on this board is chorus.
SOUNDS
The CZ-1 does have MIDI capabilities so you can use it as a controller as well as a sound module. Judging by the sounds that are on this keyboard and the limited effects; there is no way that I would purchase this brand new at the normal price because I do not feel that it is worth much more than the 150 to 200 dollar range.
OVERALL OPINION
You can create up to 64 user patches on the CZ-1 and add that to the total number of presets available which is 64 you will kind of feel like you have limitations to have far you can actually push this keyboard. It seems as there just aren’t enough options to get into depth with it. But with that being said if you grad this up at a great price it could be worth it because it will give you some different sounds to use that are not on most standard synths.72 - FP UserPublié le 01/11/08 à 00:00 (contenu en anglais)I wish there were more modulation sources than just the vibrato. The vibrato is very editable and does alot to help fatten things up but an LFO or 2 would have made this a trully killer sound design engine. I love the big lush analog chorus. It can be pretty noisy though with some sounds. It would help if there were some parameters to change for the chorus besides just depth. Another 64 patch locations would be quite welcome too. Finding the memory cartridge has proved futile. I love all the 8 segment envelope generators. All of Casio's Pro instruments had them and they are the bomb. It's too bad other synth manufacturers didn't follow Casio's lead here. I haven't quite figured out the patch layering section but so far it makes for some killer combis.
Price paid: 76.00 USD
UTILIZATION
Casio's VZ and FZ series had big screens with graphic editing of the envelopes. This machine needs that big screen too! Otherwise editing really can't be easier. There is a button for EVERYTHING so you absolutely cannot get lost in the menus. I don't have the manual to help but I don't think it's necessary. Poke around for a few hours and you'll have it mastered. A data entry knob would have been nice though.
SOUNDS
Sound is really suprisingly good. The Phase Distortion synthesis has this super funky vibe to it. Some waveforms get gritty at certain settings but sometimes this is just what you want. I've gotten some very interesting distorted guitar tones by using waves 6-8 in 1+1 mode with ring modulation. I love synths that can be programmed into overdrive. For a synth with no VCF it can be very colorful. A huge range of tones can be had by messing with the waves types and the wave envelope. Velocity can also be used for wave envelope level which allows you to create sounds with spectral dynamics. This is particularly good for clav and bass sounds where you want a very complicated sharp attack when played hard. The overall range of sounds is amazing once you get into tweaking the synth engine. It is suprisingly powerful. I've created some seriously brutal basses, giant synth leads that would make the biggest analog fanatic sit up in his seat. Conversly, you can create quite a variety of sweet digital sounds. This machine simply rocks for bells and metallic percussion. It does nice organs and pads but it's hard to get a convincing string sound. When you cross over to the dark-side it's simply a blast. Grinding, distorted, discordant sounds and wacked-out pitch sweeps are childsplay.
OVERALL OPINION
Just like all the other professional Casio synths, it weighs so damn much. Like it was carved from a block of lead. This machine gets loose screws from time to time just like my old Casio FZ-1 did. Keep em tight and it should last well into the next Ice Age.
I bought it very cheap on Ebay. I thought at the time that I might be spending too much - boy was I wrong!!! I'd happily pay 3 times the price for this instrument! It's a really good machine and the more you play it, the more it grows on you.
Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
Posted by: Somnium7 ( 6-, 2006)00 - midcomsysPublié le 09/04/09 à 22:44 (contenu en anglais)Casio's ultimate 'Phase Distortion' synth. It offers up the following:
1)5 octave unweighted velocity and aftertouch keyboard.
2)Standard pitchbend and modulation wheels.
3)16 note polyphonic.
4)Chorus effect.
5)8 Part enhanced multitimbral Midi (full sysex spec).
6)64 patch memories, 64 operational memories, 64 cartridge memories. NO PRESETS.
7)Stereo, mono, headphone outputs + sustain pedal input.
8)Backlight LCD (Blue).
9)Casio's fully programmable enhanced Pro Phase Distortion sound engine.
and lots more....
UTILIZATION
The original initialised sound set is basically the same as its siblings (CZ101 - CZ5000) which is tragic for a synth with additional sonic capabilities. The stereo chorus effect has only one control, a linear pot for depth and a bit noisy compared to dedicated FX units but good nonetheless. User manual is pretty standard although Casio didn't explain the PD sound engine very well and since this was cutting edge technology when released (initially a poor man's DX) they should of tried a little harder. Analogue anoraks where still trying to understand FM synthesis (hard even today) so a little more help would have been a godsend. The chapter 'Sound Seminar' isn't much better either. You get the impression that both are half hearted attempts at a basic explanation. That said, you have to don your cap to Casio for giving musicians such unbelievable sonic power in an age where DX7 ruled and equally cost the earth.
SOUNDS
It's a sonic marvel so Casio should have made this thing sound big, instead we got marimba. I suppose that in the 1980's manufacturers were still searching for the Holy Grail, true synthesis and acoustic realism. The CZ range for the most part sounds synthetic even plastic but is very good at glass, bell and percussive instruments. The synth is fully programmable with no presets so if you should ever want to recall the original sounds you'll have to initialise the keyboard, sadly deleting your own unless your lucky enough to have a memory cartridge or sysex dump facilities . Why you would initialise is beyond me cos they're awful to middling. Makes you wonder what Casio were thinking, cost cutting perhaps. Personally I think they would have sold a lot more CZ-1's if they showed its full potential. You've got to remember its original price (999 sterling in 1986) and competing against very stiff competition from other prominent manufacturers. Thus wading into battle with slightly damp powder.
Underneath its strength is quite simply being a Jack of all trades. It can sound clinical as any digital synth of that time, as vicious as an analogue digital hybrid, or as mellow as a classic Moog or ARP. Bass, pads, leads n sonic FX are well catered for and as previously stated can emulate most other non sample (PCM) based sound engines. Great for most music genres and generally good allrounder. Simply put, it's as good as the person programming it and always delivers. Amazingly after so many years of ownership I've yet to exhaust its sonic repetoire. The user interface is by design almost analogue instead of digital, obviously reflecting the mindset of potential buyers. It's certainly an improvement to Yamaha's incomprehensible FM system which frustrated rather than inspired. Most reviews state that Phase Distortion is psuedo FM synthesis resembling 4-op FM synths when imitating acoustic instruments. That's somewhat true but where the similarities end as PD is far more powerful than most 4-op Yammy's. I wouldn't pit it against the DX7 range, they're completely different beasts. Better referring to the VZ range for that.
Programming can be a hit n mix affair until you get to grips. You quickly find your way around and that's when you realise it's a little gem. Compared to its little brothers the added velocity and aftertouch parameters make a HUGE difference to the PD sound. It's excellent and puts this machine in a league of its own. I've yet to hear a synth like it although so distinctive it can sound very abstract compared to other synths especially in a mix. It doesn't have a filter section but opts for 3 special TAPAZOIDAL waveforms that mimic resonance. This feature has a sound all its own and doesn't really hit the mark if your looking for standard analogue LFO sweeps. Its close though and has a unique sound that you either love or loathe. ~I love it.
Personally I think the best genre for PD synthesis is pseudo analogue, for some reason it produces an astonishing array of near perfect 70's synth sounds. Monophonic leads and polypads are easily achieved with captivating and often staggering sounds produced. I own some classic Korg n Rolands from that era and this is where the CZ-1 fits in nicely. Its multi timbral features can render the afore mentioned virtually obsolete. Another excel point is bass particularily sub n techno, and with the additional velocity / aftertouch parameters it's the equal of any. As with all CZ synths it has inherited the same defined sonic weakness, noise generation. The noise circuit seems to be an after thought and linked somehow to ring modulation and isn't very usable unless you want 'Typhoon' or industrial type sounds. It can't really be a subtle addition to say flute or other breath instruments, it's just harsh n plastic more akin to atmospheric background noise. Modulation effects are really good with 4 waveforms creating some unique sounds when coupled to Casio's 8 stage envelopes that are associated with vitually every wave shaping parameter.
Another enhancement added is 'Operation Memory' which is an additional 64 memories that can generally be either tone mix or keyboard splits. Crucially you get a lot of control for each individual sound such as oct+/- chorus on/off, mono/poly modes, portamento, glide, modulation etc etc. This is great for live performances and is only available on the CZ-1. Multi timbral mode also has extra features over the rest of the range. You can assign single / multiple notes plus add performance contols to each channel. The onboard midi is quicker than say the CZ3000, maybe updated processing power. Sadly these settings can't be saved to operations memory so having to manually change the settings, shame. I have to give it a ten since it is the best PD synth ever and that includes the rare VZ IPD synths. I own a VZ10M which doesn't sound anything like a CZ and athough excellent it's just to complicated.
OVERALL OPINION
I've owned my machine since 1990 and at one point had 2 of them. Strangely never sounding like the other even with the same sound patches. Obviously different production batches. I also owned a CZ3000 which isn't as good (more handsome though). I've read somewhere that CZ-1 competes with CZ5000. Well put it this way the CZ5000 is a CZ3000 with a simple sequencer (similar to the SZ-1) with none of the CZ-1's extra parameters. If you use a modern computer based sequencer then the CZ-1 pips it although there was never any doubt.
There isn't much to hate about it really, the insane menu system could be improved upon but nowadays you can get computer based editors. Saying that I've never come across an editor that supports the CZ-1's extra features so your stuck with just the standard parameters supported by its CZ siblings. Pity. I got it from a local music shops shutting down sale and was an ex demo. I think I got it for 40 pounds sterling, not bad eh. Value for money then but nowadays your lucky to see reasonably priced CZ's for sale even on EBAY. Usually it's either a battered CZ101/1000 and these go for a couple of hundred pounds. CZ-1 is a rare synth with owners reluctant to give them up, little wonder because they're just that good n full of character. I'm sure Phase Distortion will make a comeback some day probably in VST format. I'm glad I kept mine and if it died I would either get it repaired or replaced.
I can't applaud Casio enough for introducing the CZ/FZ/VZ and other 'Z' ranges. They were affordable cutting edge machines that should have brought Casio to the fore in the pro music scene. I just think that they should of done more to advertise and promote their commitment. Rather pro musicians were still left with the assumption that these were just overgrown toys and 'just a Casio' which would spoil the image. If they just done a little more a little different they should have progressed. Saying that, nowadays this range of synths is just as popular if not moreso.
Summing up, one of Casio's finest moments but never given enough Casio commitment to realise its full potential. Damn shame...20 - iob27Publié le 19/06/09 à 23:34C'est la technologie de distorsion de phase, propre à CASIO. Cela ressemble parfois à la FM de Yamaha, mais la richesse et la variété en moins : il n'y a que 2 oscillateurs donc cela limite les variations de phases comme la FM sait produire.
16 voix, c'est mieux que le CZ1000. Dynamique et aftertouch : le seul de la game à faire cela. Concrètement, cela apporte un peu de variété.
Pas de séquenceur.
Un chorus, mais qui souffle terrible et qui (sur mon CZ1) est assez déséquilibré, donc assez inutile.
Ecran peu (rétro-éclairage en panne), mais suffisamment lisible.
Un glide : un bend de chaque début de notes. Pas courant sur les synthés, mais assez inutile car équivalent à l'enveloppe
de haut…Lire la suiteC'est la technologie de distorsion de phase, propre à CASIO. Cela ressemble parfois à la FM de Yamaha, mais la richesse et la variété en moins : il n'y a que 2 oscillateurs donc cela limite les variations de phases comme la FM sait produire.
16 voix, c'est mieux que le CZ1000. Dynamique et aftertouch : le seul de la game à faire cela. Concrètement, cela apporte un peu de variété.
Pas de séquenceur.
Un chorus, mais qui souffle terrible et qui (sur mon CZ1) est assez déséquilibré, donc assez inutile.
Ecran peu (rétro-éclairage en panne), mais suffisamment lisible.
Un glide : un bend de chaque début de notes. Pas courant sur les synthés, mais assez inutile car équivalent à l'enveloppe
de hauteur.
Les enveloppes sont très souples : on peut choisir où mettre le sustain, et 8 segments. Peut servir à créer des attaques (multiples) de son particulières.
UTILISATION
Très simple à utiliser, même sans manuel. Assez rare pour être souligné.
Bizarreries : dans un sous menu possibilité de couper le chorus, mais il y a un curseur qui le coupe aussi.
SONORITÉS
Bon : des sons un peu bizarres, très loin de la réalité. Ces sons aussi très typées, facilement reconnaissables : les "brass" sont très typiques.
On peut considérer cela comme un défaut ou ... une qualité, si on veut avoir des sons différents.
AVIS GLOBAL
Mon premier synthé à été un CZ1000, car je n'avais pas les moyens d'avoir mieux, comme par exemple à l'époque un DX7. Donc pour moi les sons sont assez "cheap", c'est dire un peu pauvre et sonnant un peu nul, très typés et ... aussi un peu ridicules. Je me souviens avoir tenté de jouer "Jump" avec un CZ1000, al la al que cela fessais beauf ... bien loin du son d'un Oberheim ..
C'était aussi un des tout premier synthé multi-timbral à un prix amateur !
Mais finalement c'est ce coté rétro, et premier synthé, qui pour moi fait son charme, et puis il est si facile à programmer ... c'est surement celui que j'ai le plus programmé : les faibles sons d'usine et le manque d'argent pour acheter mieux force à chercher un peu et
à trouver des sons originaux (je les mettrais sur un site WEB quelque part).
Pour finir : si on sort des imitations très ratées (en fait impossibles à faire avec ce synthé) de pianos, de guitares, de cellos (horrible) etc
il peut faire des bruits métalliques bizarres, ou très artificiels, pour donner un genre à sa musique, en tout cas un coté unique.
Ma note est faible (2) car reflète la dure réalité : cette synthèse de CASIO est un peu faible et produit des sons très artificiels souvent sans grand intérêt, bien loin de la richesse de la synthèse FM, bref le "DX7 du pauvre" mais j'ai quand même racheté sur le tard un CZ1 d'occas pour retrouver la joie des sons pourris de mon CZ100 que j'avais revendu (pour un EPS d'ENSONIQ).
Vous êtes prévenus !Lire moins1223 - forum.girardPublié le 13/02/07 à 23:485 octaves
1 picth, 1 modulation
3 midis, 1 pédale sustain
1 chorus avec plein de souffle
polyphonies : 16 voies, 8 en pratique, 4 si superposition de sons.
UTILISATION
L'édition des sons est super facile. ( A l'époque un pote avait un DX7, les sons étaient peut-être mieux ( c'est pas mon avis ), mais bonjour la prise de tête pour faire un son, aussi bien pour l'imaginer que pour renter les paramètres, quelle horreur ).
Si quelqu'un n'arrive pas à se servir d'un CZ, alors inutile qu'il cherche quelque chose de plus simple, il vaut mieux qu'il achète un vrai piano, 88 touches et c'est tout
SONORITÉS
Je l'aime toujours autant, pour les sons d'orgues, de basses, de cuivres…Lire la suite5 octaves
1 picth, 1 modulation
3 midis, 1 pédale sustain
1 chorus avec plein de souffle
polyphonies : 16 voies, 8 en pratique, 4 si superposition de sons.
UTILISATION
L'édition des sons est super facile. ( A l'époque un pote avait un DX7, les sons étaient peut-être mieux ( c'est pas mon avis ), mais bonjour la prise de tête pour faire un son, aussi bien pour l'imaginer que pour renter les paramètres, quelle horreur ).
Si quelqu'un n'arrive pas à se servir d'un CZ, alors inutile qu'il cherche quelque chose de plus simple, il vaut mieux qu'il achète un vrai piano, 88 touches et c'est tout
SONORITÉS
Je l'aime toujours autant, pour les sons d'orgues, de basses, de cuivres ( synthétique c'est sûr ) il est toujours aussi bon, les guitares aussi, mais il faut trouver comment jouer
Pour les pianos, super nul.
Pour les sons style harpo-laser je l'aime bien aussi.
Pour les bidouillages à la gomme, assez facile de faire ce qu'on veut.
D'une manière générale, les sons sont assez typés, mais pas désagréables.
AVIS GLOBAL
Je l'ai acheté neuf en 1986, 6600 francs à l'époque, en tout cas c'était pas rien ( j'étais étudiant,vive les jobs d'été ).
Il marche toujours impeccablement, sauf le rétro-éclairage.
Bon la polyphonie est vraiment limitée aujourd'hui, et le clavier super léger ( encore que ça peut être assez pratique ).
En tout cas je ne regrette pas mon achat, sauf peut-être que si je ne l'avais pas acheté, j'aurais eu les sous pour acheter un VZ-1...Lire moins72 - phonoidPublié le 29/08/06 à 17:53Clavier 61 touches avec 2 molettes et 2 faders...
UTILISATION
L'édition est super simple on plus on créér des sons via toutes les enveloppes 8 au total le point fort de la machine, le chorus est gros, on peux le contrôlé directemnet avec un fader...
en plus le cz1 posséde plusieurs cartouches, pour encore plus de sons, l'édition est par un simple clic, donc on peux jouer rapidement pour de la scene...
trés belle panoramique pour des belles nappes.
le manuel est clair et explique bien le systeme cazio unique...
SONORITÉS
Les sons peuvent être de tout style suffit de connaître le synthe et de les bien l'exploiter, le filtre est bien ainsi que la vélocité...
AVIS GLOBAL[/…Lire la suiteClavier 61 touches avec 2 molettes et 2 faders...
UTILISATION
L'édition est super simple on plus on créér des sons via toutes les enveloppes 8 au total le point fort de la machine, le chorus est gros, on peux le contrôlé directemnet avec un fader...
en plus le cz1 posséde plusieurs cartouches, pour encore plus de sons, l'édition est par un simple clic, donc on peux jouer rapidement pour de la scene...
trés belle panoramique pour des belles nappes.
le manuel est clair et explique bien le systeme cazio unique...
SONORITÉS
Les sons peuvent être de tout style suffit de connaître le synthe et de les bien l'exploiter, le filtre est bien ainsi que la vélocité...
AVIS GLOBAL
Le rapport qualité prix est indénible, si vous avez l'occasion n'hésitez pas pour ma part je l'ai trouvé dans truc discount prés de chez moi pour 300 euros...Lire moins42