Les perles de Youtube
- 46 205 réponses
- 629 participants
- 2 864 041 vues
- 538 followers

Anonyme

J'ouvre ici ze concours des perles :
Je commence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjeMDvCdrtc
à vous

srak

Pas une perle, mais ça m'a amusé.
Réaction d'un hip hopeux lorsqu'il découvre RATM
En écoutant des années (beaucoup d'années) après ça me fait toujours cet effet.
Quand au lascar, j'aimerai voir sa réaction en écoutant les Beastie Boys.

Traumax

Bref, si le mec est un américain qui connait le hip hop, il a deja entendu parler des Beastie Boys.

sqoqo

Là sur la vidéo, le bon passage est entre 1'50 et 3'40, sur "killing in the name" , quand il se met à la fin à gueuler fuck you I won't do what you tell me

srak

Les Beastie ont toujours été intégrés au rap game US. Signés chez Def Jam dès le début, le taf avec Rick Rubin, Mix Mastermike, leur première tournée a été l'ouverture de Run DMC.
Bref, si le mec est un américain qui connait le hip hop, il a deja entendu parler des Beastie Boys.
Sabotage peut être considéré comme de la fusion rap/rock bien avant RATM.
A l'origine, les Beastie Boys était un groupe de punk.
Ebony and Ivory...
[ Dernière édition du message le 16/10/2017 à 11:15:47 ]

Dr Pouet



Pucelle_Dabidjan

Citation de : oryjen
Un homme, un vrai!
Le pire, c'est que dans la section commentaire, t'as des mécanos avec 30 ans de métiers qui lui disent que c'est une mauvaise idée. Mais rienàfoutre. :-)

oryjen

Le mec est complètement frappé!

Il y en a toute une série, tous plus dingues les uns que les autres.
Un régal!



Tiens, j'aime bien celle-là aussi:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L'artiste entrouvre une fenêtre sur le réel; le "réaliste pragmatique" s'éclaire donc avec une vessie.
[ Dernière édition du message le 17/10/2017 à 15:16:03 ]

Anonyme


KoalaMan

On ne voit bien qu'avec les yeux. Le cœur est invisible pour l'essentiel.

Pictocube

La dernière vidéo de chandellier est assez jolie :
Tant qu'il y aura des couilles en or, il y aura des lames en acier

KoalaMan


Par contre, le mec est mort combien de fois en faisant la vidéo ?
On ne voit bien qu'avec les yeux. Le cœur est invisible pour l'essentiel.

8oris


oryjen


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L'artiste entrouvre une fenêtre sur le réel; le "réaliste pragmatique" s'éclaire donc avec une vessie.

Anonyme


oryjen


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L'artiste entrouvre une fenêtre sur le réel; le "réaliste pragmatique" s'éclaire donc avec une vessie.

Rifki


Anonyme


Rifki


Dr Pouet


Je me demande bien comment fonctionne tout son bordel...

Will Zégal


Dr Pouet

https://www.synthtopia.com/content/2013/12/04/vangelis-and-the-journey-to-ithaka-documentary-now-available/
« Vangelis and the journey to Ithaka » Documentary.
Je vais essayer de trouver quelques explications sous forme de texte.

Dr Pouet

http://forum.vintagesynth.com/viewtopic.php?p=710654&sid=f658b8e0ffde93d939a70d8bba84c84f#p710654
Vangelis uses a system he designed himself. It's often referred to as his "Direct System" because the system allows him to compose, mix and record live.
Each of the small white modules provides comprehensive MIDI control access to a (off the shelf) synthesizer or module situated remotely and connected to the module over copper-net and MIDI. While I don't have a full understanding of the module capabilities, each module provides MIDI control and access to program selection, edit functions, arpeggiation and sequencing and so on.
Critical to the system is the use of a series of volume / expression pedals - one per module - which I believe not only allows him to add expression, but possibly transmits MIDI data for articulation / layering type capabilities (though evidence for that is tentative). Note that expression pedals have always been important to Vangelis in creating expression and recording it live to tape.
The current system is a distant cousin / evolution from a hardware sequencer released in the 80's called the ZYKLUS. That device incorporated 12 polyphonic sequencers, playable live (and playable in various modes such as repeat/loop, or 'one shot' (forward or reverse)). So on the ZYKLUS you could record up to 12 polyphonic sequences into it, and then play/trigger those sequences from a connected MIDI keyboard controller during live performance. All sorts of possibilities were realizable. For example, lets say you recorded a 4 note sequence into sequence 1 comprising notes c-d-e-f. Once recorded, you could immediately trigger the sequence to play simply by holding down the c note on your keyboard. If you held a chord down, the sequence would play three times in parallel producing sequenced chords (though no intelligent transposing going on - just parallel playing based on each note acting as root for that instance of the sequence). If you recorded 12 different sequences - all 12 could be triggered on each note - offering staggeringly complex multi-sequencing play back (up to a maximum polyphony of 48 simultaneous notes) - and every note played on the controller retriggers the sequences. Of course you could assign separate MIDI channels and keyboard zones to separate sequences. Overall, an extraordinary realtime sequence device that has never been repeated or surpassed. The desigenr, Bill Marshall, sought to sell the underlying technology to Ableton quite recently and whether or not they bought it, they have not implemented it. Surely a next step for MIDI clip sequencing (incorporating intelligent transposing too?). Only 40 ZYKLUS's were ever made (and I own one).
However, as interesting as all of that is, this is not what caught the interest and triggered the fascination for Vangelis. The other aspect to the ZYKLUS is that it is a very capable device of managing MIDI hardware setups. You can program all manner of program-changes and midi-hardware midi configurations within the ZYKLUS, and with the press of a button, transmit all of that data around an entire MIDI hardware setup via the ZYKLUS's 8 separate MIDI OUT ports. This is why Vangelis liked it. Being a hardware only composer (even to this day he records live and does not use any of the standard DAWs (I think he uses a Radar HD recording system); in the 80's, Vangelis liked the idea of being able to reconfigure his plethora of MIDI synthesizers fast, on-the-fly, and immediately by simply pre-programming the ZYKLUS with all the required program changes and so on - and by simply selecting a new ZYKLUS program, having the entire setup re-configured to his immediate desire. A 'Direct' system. So he used this on his 'Direct' album in 1987, and even hired Bill Marshall subsequently to develop a new and more comprehensive system which was called the 'Direct System'. So his current system is an evolution of that, where each small white module is basically a a hardware MIDI controller for a back end synthesizer (and of course where Vangelis has implemented many custom features and requirements that remain largely a mystery).
Hence to this day, he uses MIDI only as a control protocol, and records little if any MIDI note data to a DAW, instead preferring to perform live on the keyboard and record straight to audio only. I'm on the mailing list for a Belgian company called Alyesum who implement smart audio network technology and posted just the other day that they have just completed a custom upgrade of Vangelis' system to accommodate 32 of these modules, using copper-net and MIDI, an improvement from 16 modules which seems to have been the upper limit possible in the system until now.
Kevin.
[ Dernière édition du message le 18/10/2017 à 10:47:28 ]

Pictocube

Tant qu'il y aura des couilles en or, il y aura des lames en acier

Anonyme



Will Zégal

- < Liste des sujets
- Charte