Sujet Qui utilise la mp7
- 16 réponses
- 9 participants
- 1 786 vues
- 1 follower
!Erreur404!
- 1
- 2
Soulwilliam
avatar au congo
Soulwilliam
Delatre
Big Mike
F.u.c.k. d.a.t.
avatar au congo
ils disent que la quantisation est particulière sur la mpc à cause d'une sombre histoire de codage a 96 ppq, c ce qui donne le feeling spécial d'un séquencage sur mpc, mais la à froid j'ai pas le lien, mais cherche sur groups.yahoo.com le forum xl-7 et cherche mpc,
G PAS TROUVé
sauf ca
Citation : That's a super tuff call to make, I know, I had to make the exact same
choice. In the end, I obviously bought an XL7 over the MPC2k. They both have
so many good and bad points to there sequencing capabilities, that they
nearly cancel each other out....there are a few major differences that
helped me make my decision though....
bla bla, j'ai hésité comme toi (entre la mpc et la xl-7), mais finalement, j'ai acheté la xl-7. ils se valent tous les deux au niveau du séquenceur. cependant certaines choses ont orientées mon choix:
Citation : the xx-7's have over twice as much onboard max sequencing memory as the MPC
(300,000 compared to 120,000 events). BUT, the MPC has the easy access disk
storage, where as the xx7's have all of the patterns internal when you start
it, which wouldnt be bad if it weren't such a pain to have to use the one
part of your studio that you dont want to take to a gig with you (the PC) in
order to load and backup the entire thing.
les xx-7 ont au moins 2 fois plus de capacité de séquencage (300000 xl7/120000 mpx)
mais la mpc a une plus grande facilité de stockage, alors que l'accès à un pattern particulier sur ma xx-7 dans une config studio est un peu galère.
Citation : In the MPC's favor though, is it has twice as many simultaneous tracks that
can be playing at once, BUT, on the other hand, the one I had been using had
the newest OS, and still crashed 3 times as much as the xx7s.
??
Citation : If you want easy to use and sequence sampling capabilities, the MPC is
great, but the xx7s have all the onboard sounds...so it just depends on how
you prefer your source material.
si tu veux facilement sampler et séquencer prend la mpc, mais la xx-7 a pleins de sons d'origines, donc ca dépend de tes sources niveau son
Citation : The xx7's ALSO have all the assignable knobs, but if you have a Nord Modular
(you didnt say which Nord you have) then you already have more than enough
knobs I'm sure.
les xx-7 ont AUSSI des potards assignables, mais si tu as déja une interface genre Nord Modular, tu as déja tous les boutons dont tu as besoin.
Citation : The MPC's pads are much nicer imho, and the roll button is much easier to
use, and you can change the time signature in realtime as well, which the
xx7s can not do while rolling. In fact, the xx7's can ONLY use the roll (or
repeat) function while RECORDING! AH! That still pisses me off.
les pads de la mpc sont meilleurs selon moi, and le roll bouton est plus facile a utiliser, tu peux changer la signature du temps (3/4 -> 4/4 je pense) en temps réel, et pas sur la xx-7. enfait la xx-7 peut utiliser le bouton roll/repeat QUE pendant l'enregistrement, ca me pete.
Citation : The last BIG difference is the external midi sequencing cpabilities....the
MPC wins hands down. The xx7s do a good job, but are a bit tedious for
configureing every single pattern while still retaing internal sound rom
sequencing capabilities, which in themselves can be glitchy as well (in
terms of the right patch STAYING saved with the right sequence!)
la dernière grosse différence est le séquencage externe (midi), la mpc gagne par ko. la xx-7 fait son boulot, mais chie quand il faut séquencer en externe, c pas facile par exemple de garder les bons presets pour les bons patterns
Citation : ....geeze, sounds like I made the wrong choice! lol! jk, I'm happy with the
xl7, but i cant honestly say that I wouldnt go the other route if I had the
chance to. Overall, I found the MPCs more user friendly, but I also consider
my K2500 user friendly, which many people would beg to differ with.
ouais ca donne l'impression que j'ai fais le mauvais choix, mais en fait j'aime bien la xx-7, et que je ne la changerais pas pour autre chose. meme si je trouve la mpc tres simple (meme si je trouve la k2500 tres simpe aussi)
Citation : To sum it up, the MPC's are extremely well endowed drum machines, and the
xx7's have the potential to blow them away in terms of capabilities and
flexibility, they just have some things to fix in my opinion first.
pour résumer, les mpcs sont d bonnes boites à rythme, mais les xx-7 ont les possibilités (techniques) n2cessaires pour les niquer, j'espere que tous les pbs seront résolus avec le prochain os.
Voila
ya aussi ca, si qqun connait l'anglais :-D
Citation : At the top the answer to "use external sequencing or PC sequencing?" is a
very complex issue and you will get lots of advice on that. Bottom line:
the choice depends on how you like to work, how you like to interact with
your gear, your tolerance for dealing with non-music issues, and your
affinity to the screen-mouse-keyboard interface.
I've used an MPC3000 for a while and am familiar with the MPC2K sequencing.
You will find I believe that the MPC is a better work horse sequencer for
studio work. You have many, many more tracks to work with (XX7 is only 16).
You can have sequences of lengths of your choosing (the XX7 restricts
patterns to 32 measures or less and its one song sequence is a tad on the
underpowered side with its single, though multichannel track). You can also
run two sequencing in parallel, which is a valuable tool in itself.
The MPC way of working is pretty smooth and conducive to laying down tracks.
So is the XX7. the XX7 has grid-style programming (Roland X0X style) where
as the MPC does not.
The MPC is a bit stronger at MIDI editing but the XX7 is improving in this
area.
The XX7 is stronger as an interactive or live performance tool. It also has
those sixteen programmable knobs which can be useful (though in your case
the Nord and SNII has that pretty well covered).
Finally the MPC has storage options like floppy and SCSI drives. The XX7
requires connection to a computer for loading and saving its memory.
Sampling on the MPC for beats and loops; built-sounds on the XX7 that are
very good and expandable with additional sound ROMs.
That all said, you will find the XX7 will work well in your use. Emu is
committed to improving the XX7 and has announced its intention to have a new
OS available early next year. The MPC, on the other hand is what it is.
Akai has moved on to the monumental and still unfinished MPC4000.
In my mind it would be no contest if you were comparing a new XX7 to a new
MPC because of the price difference. But getting either at the same
price... Hard to pass up an MPC that cheap!
One additional thought. The XX7 will translate well going forward into a
world where you become more and more computer-centered in your production.
It can be a good control surface for software sequencers and software
instruments. the MPC offers no such benefit.
drk
Soulwilliam
Soulwilliam
- < Liste des sujets
- Charte
- 1
- 2