Les questions auxquelles on n'a pas les réponses mais un AFien peut les avoir

Les chrétiens vénèrent Jésus, mort sur la croix, au point que la croix est devenue leur emblème.
Il tenait pas seul sur ladite croix, il a été cloué, sans quoi il serait mort de fractures multiples en chutant.
Pourquoi les chrétiens ne vénèrent-ils pas aussi les clous qui ont fixé le Jésus sur la croix ?
Qu'est la croix sans les clous, hein ?

A possibility that does not require tying is that the nails were inserted just above the wrist, between the two bones of the forearm (the radius and the ulna).[33]

An experiment that was the subject of a documentary on the National Geographic Channel's Quest For Truth: The Crucifixion, showed that nailed feet provided enough support for the body, and that the hands could have been merely tied. Nailing the feet to the side of the cross relieves strain on the wrists by placing most of the weight on the lower body.

Another possibility, suggested by Frederick Zugibe, is that the nails may have been driven in at an angle, entering in the palm in the crease that delineates the bulky region at the base of the thumb, and exiting in the wrist, passing through the carpal tunnel.

A foot-rest (suppedaneum) attached to the cross, perhaps for the purpose of taking the person's weight off the wrists, is sometimes included in representations of the crucifixion of Jesus, but is not discussed in ancient sources. Some scholars interpret the Alexamenos graffito, the earliest surviving depiction of the Crucifixion, as including such a foot-rest. Ancient sources also mention the sedile, a small seat attached to the front of the cross, about halfway down, which could have served a similar purpose.

In 1968, archaeologists discovered at Giv'at ha-Mivtar in northeast Jerusalem the remains of one Jehohanan, who had been crucified in the 1st century. The remains included a heel bone with a nail driven through it from the side. The tip of the nail was bent, perhaps because of striking a knot in the upright beam, which prevented it being extracted from the foot. A first inaccurate account of the length of the nail led some to believe that it had been driven through both heels, suggesting that the man had been placed in a sort of sidesaddle position, but the true length of the nail, 11.5 cm (4.53 inches), suggests instead that in this case of crucifixion the heels were nailed to opposite sides of the upright. The skeleton from Giv'at ha-Mivtar is currently the only recovered example of ancient crucifixion in the archaeological record.

Là où c'est lol, c'est qu'il me semble que c'est très très peu probable que Jesus ait été cloué sur la croix. En effet, la pratique de la crucifixion consistait plutôt à attacher la personne. En effet, un toubib ou un anatomiste pourra le préciser, mais je crois qu'il y a à peu près zéro chance pour que les tendons des mains puissent tenir le poids d'un corps le temps que celui-ci meure de suffocation. Cloué par les mains, Jésus se serait donc cassé la gueule avant d'être mort.
A moins qu'il n'ait été cloué par les avant-bras, un peu avant le poignet. Mais pourquoi toute la statuaire montre des clous au niveau des mains ?

Je cherchais la vidéo de Decaux