Qui est content de Vista pour la MAO ?

Hors sujet :

Citation : pourquoi changer quelque chose qui marche bien

Hors sujet : Shmarko> ravi d'avoir effacé tout quiproquo

Hors sujet : Wép,idem pour moi, j'ai ubuntu studio en dual boot avec xp, c'est vraiment super comme système,mais je suis débutant quand même dans le monde de la mao sous linux alors je suis toujours en période de teste et de découverte..l'implémentation du midi sous ardour sera un pas de géant.

Hors sujet : Tu veux dire qu'il n'y a pas de gestion midi dans Ardour pour l'instant??? Question sans doute bête: j'espère qu'il y a d'autres logiciels sous linux qui le prennent en charge?

Hors sujet : http://www.baudelet.net/windows-vista/

Citation : je n'ai jamais vu une aussi grosse daube que cette indexation..

Citation : Je tourne avec avast (gratuit pour les particuliers) et le pare-feu de Windows, jamais eu le moindre problème.

Hors sujet :

Citation : A la place, j'ai téléchargé un finder tout simple

Citation : The comparison between operating systems is very interesting. In the 10 months that Vista has been available to the general public, the support from music software and hardware manufacturers has been slow but steady. Issues remain, like those of working at very low (<2ms) latencies, but on the whole it is not far off XP in terms of DAW performance. Vista 64 certainly looks very encouraging winning half of the tests by a small margin. Vista 64 should be the future, it holds the promise of far greater performance than we've seen here, but support by the music software and hardware manufacturers has been even slower than Vista 32. Performance in XP has no where to go, it's reached its peak, we've got everything out of it that we're going to, whereas Vista 64 hasn't even begun to realise its potential and hopefully, over time, we'll all begin to benefit.

So, what OS should you choose for your system? The simplest answer is to stick with XP - it's stable, fast and is tried and tested with absolutely everything. Vista 32 brings lots of advantages in terms of ease of use, future compatibility and security but has no advantage in DAW performance terms. However, Vista 32 is certainly no slouch and if the attraction of the other non-musical features tempts you to Vista then you won't be losing too much DAW performance on a properly configured machine. Vista 64 is the way to go in terms of performance and future proofing but only provided that the hardware and software you want to run is compatible - that is most important. But with 64-bit, Vista 64 compatible versions of GigaStudio and other sample based instruments from EastWest and Vienna Symphonic just around the corner the future of Vista 64 is looking quite rosey.

Citation : Au final il doit y avoir une réserve de puissance encore large derrière malgré aero et tout ça, non ?